Honesty, the Best Public Policy

Cheaters may not prosper, but according to a new ABC story, they do graduate.  As technology evolves so has intellectual dishonesty.  According to writer Dominick Tao, the Internet has become a haven for students who are both browsing-and sharing-ways to outsmart their teachers.  Helped by everything from invisible ink pens to YouTube videos, this moral indifference is spreading faster than the products that fuel it.  In a shocking national poll, more than 70 percent of collage students admitted to cheating at least once.  When it comes to personal integrity, these young adults just don’t get it.  Considering the culture they live in, who can blame them?  They’ve been taught by Congress, Wall Street, and Hollywood that the ends justifies the means.

Unfortunately, this collapse of values at college has even wider implications.  Not only are we raising a generation of moral relativists, but we have done so while witnessing what this deep-seated corruption can do to our country.  It levels corporations, tarnishes our political process, and breeds an incredible mistrust between voters and their elected leaders.  Until we get down to the business of instilling a sense of honesty and ethics into society, we are only cheating ourselves.

Homeschooling Gestapo Strikes Again

What do homeschooling and drunk driving have in common? A lot, according to a German judge who made the comparison when he sentenced parents to three months in jail for educating their children at home. Juergen and Rosemarie Dudek, both Christians, are one of the estimated 400 couples in Germany who secretly homeschool their kids despite an antiquated ban on the practice instituted by Adolf Hitler 70 years ago. The decision, which smacks of Nazi-era oppression, will be appealed to a higher court, where the ruling will likely stand. German courts have repeatedly upheld homeschooling as a form of “child abuse,” a conclusion echoing that of a California court last February when a three-judge panel struck down the rights of homeschooling parents in that state. While the California ruling was later vacated, both have something in common–the desire to use public education as a vehicle for indoctrinating children in the liberal views of the state.

An article by Newt Gingrich
March 25, 2008 

Parents “do not have a constitutional right to homeschool their children.”

So wrote a California judge in a case that has ominous potential for the estimated one million-plus American families who have opted out of the public education monopoly and choose to educate their children at home.

Although the ruling is being appealed to the California Supreme Court, as it now stands, the 166,000 California children who are home schooled are truant, and their parents are criminals. Welcome, as the Wall Street Journal editorialized, to a “strange new chapter” in the “annals of judicial imperialism.”

No Teaching Credentials? No Home Schooling.

For background, you should know that although California’s compulsory education law requires that all children between the ages of six and 18 attend a full-time day school, the state law also contains provisions for parents to legally teach their children at home. Under these provisions, homeschooling by unlicensed moms and dads has flourished in California, as it has across the nation.

But all this began to change when the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services recently investigated a claim of abuse by a homeschooled child. Lawyers representing the child invoked the California compulsory education statute to send the child to a public school and a judge eventually agreed, ruling that homeschooling by an unlicensed parent teacher is illegal. Thus, writes the Journal, “a single case of parental abuse is being used to promote the registration of all parents who crack a book for their kids.”

The long and short of it: A California court has ruled that if you haven’t spent four years attending a teaching college and getting the proper licenses from the state, you can’t homeschool your children.

Another Case of a Special Interest Using the Courts to Do What It Can’t at the Voting Booth

The merits of homeschooling speak for themselves. Homeschooled children dominate academic competitions and get superior scores on standardized tests. They excel at all the things compulsory education laws are meant to promote, such as school attendance, academics and civic education.

But the California homeschooling decision is important in another respect — even those of us who don’t homeschool our kids should be outraged and concerned.

The decision represents yet another case of a special interest — in this case, the education unions and bureaucracy — using the courts to get what they can’t get through the popular vote.

This is yet another example of judicial supremacy: Rule by an out-of-control judiciary rather than the will of the people. It joins court rulings such as the removal of “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance on a long list of usurpations of the freedom and self-determination of the American people.

What You Can Do About It

The good news is that citizen activism can be a powerful tool in fighting judicial supremacy.

A good example is the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), a group fighting for the rights of homeschooling parents in California and states across the nation.

They initiated a petition drive in the wake of the California decision that attracted a quarter of a million signatures in 10 days. The effort was so successful that they’ve stopped gathering signatures. But you can still learn more and help their cause by going to HSLDA.org.

And don’t stop there. Homeschool regulations are overwhelmingly developed at the state-government level. Call or write your state representatives and let them know that this is one case of judicial supremacy that will not stand.

Parental Authority No Match for Court’s
from Family Research Council

Last week, a federal appeals court refused to uphold the parental and religious rights of two Massachusetts couples–David and Tonia Parker and Rob and Robin Wirthlin–whose young children were exposed to books that promoted homosexual “marriage” in their elementary school. I met and interviewed the Parkers and the Wirthlins for FRC’s Liberty Sunday broadcast from Boston in October 2006 (and our “Critical Mass” DVD includes their stories). It’s amazing how cavalierly the court’s decision dismisses the evidence that school officials engaged in the deliberate indoctrination of children. The school sought to coerce its students into accepting values that are way outside the mainstream and in direct contradiction to those of their parents. Yet the same courts that are trying to reinvent the family are encouraging the public schools to act as their surrogate. A lawyer for the parents has vowed to appeal all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. They could also sue in state court, given the blatant violation of a state law which mandates that parents be notified before any discussion of “human sexuality issues.” Of course, since it was Massachusetts’ Supreme Court that legalized same-sex “marriage,” you can imagine what the families’ chances of winning would be! The federal court recommended the parents “seek recourse” through the legislative process. But that is small comfort considering that when pro-family forces do succeed, as they did in Boyd County, Kentucky, judicial activists simply rewrite the democratic decisions to suit their political agenda. When family values clash with homosexual activism in the public schools, rulings like this one prove that parents’ rights continue to be wronged.

Additional Resources
FRC “Critical Mass” DVD
FRC pamphlet “Homosexuality in Your Child’s School”